Court Blocks BOI Reporting Deadline For Corporate Transparency Act
On December 3, 2024, a Texas-based federal court issued a sweeping order prohibiting the federal government from enforcing the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) anywhere in the country. Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc., et al. v. Garland, et al., Case No. 4:24-cv-478 (E.D. Tex.). The Court held that the CTA—which would have required an estimated 32.5 million companies in the United States as of January 1, 2024, to submit sensitive information regarding their “beneficial owners” (BOI) to the United States Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) by January 1, 2025—was likely unconstitutional and that its implementation would irreparably harm reporting companies if they were forced to comply. The Court enjoined the CTA’s enforcement nationwide, specifically stating that neither the Act nor its related regulations may be enforced, and that “reporting companies need not comply with the CTA’s January 1, 2025, BOI reporting deadline[.]”
The Court determined that Congress exceeded its legislative powers when it enacted the CTA, which the Court characterized as “quasi-Orwellian.” In the Court’s view, upholding the CTA and its requirement that most entities created or registered under state law must continually disclose information to the federal government “would be to rubber-stamp a new form of federal power” that would “threaten the very fabric of our system of federalism.” The Court saw the CTA as a dangerous precedent, observing that “[i]f the Court were to sanction such an extension of legislative power today, then there is no telling how Congress would control companies tomorrow. The fact that a company is a company does not knight Congress with some supreme power to regulate them in all aspects—especially through the CTA[.]” The Court further found that forcing reporting companies to comply with the CTA substantially threatens their constitutional rights. Given the CTA’s constitutional flaws and threatened harm, the Court enjoined the federal government from enforcing it pending further order of the Court.
